Physician-Assisted Suicide Should be Legalized Abstract Reported cases of suicide because of terminal illnesses have been on the rise. At present, several terminal diseases plague our community. Key among these terminal diseases includes cancer and diabetes Appel, Adult patients have always considered the option of terminating their lives to avert the suffering that comes with the disease.
Jeffrey and Lonette Stayton Awards for Writing The right to assisted suicide is a significant topic that concerns people all over the United States.
The debates go back and forth about whether a dying patient has the right to die with the assistance of a physician. Some are against it because of religious and moral reasons. Others are for it because of their compassion and respect for the dying.
Physicians are also divided on the issue. They differ where they place the line that separates relief from dying--and killing. For many the main concern with assisted suicide lies with the competence of the terminally ill.
Many terminally ill patients who are in the final stages of their lives have requested doctors to aid them in exercising active euthanasia. It is sad to realize that these people are in great agony and that to them the only hope of bringing that agony to a halt is through assisted suicide.
When people see the word euthanasia, they see the meaning of the word in two different lights. Euthanasia for some carries a negative connotation; it is the same as murder.
For others, however, euthanasia is the act of putting someone to death painlessly, or allowing a person suffering from an incurable and painful disease or condition to die by withholding extreme medical measures.
But after studying both sides of the issue, a compassionate individual must conclude that competent terminal patients should be given the right to assisted suicide in order to end their suffering, reduce the damaging financial effects of hospital care on their families, and preserve the individual right of people to determine their own fate.
Medical technology today has achieved remarkable feats in prolonging the lives of human beings. For the terminally ill, however, it is just a means of prolonging suffering.
Medicine is supposed to alleviate the suffering that a patient undergoes. Yet the only thing that medical technology does for a dying patient is give that patient more pain and agony day after day.
Some terminal patients in the past have gone to their doctors and asked for a final medication that would take all the pain away— lethal drugs.
For example, as Ronald Dworkin recounts, Lillian Boyes, an English woman who was suffering from a severe case of rheumatoid arthritis, begged her doctor to assist her to die because she could no longer stand the pain Another example is Dr.
Khalili] was a pain specialist; he could get any kind of pain medication, but he came to Dr. Terminally ill patients should have the right to assisted suicide because it is the best means for them to end the pain caused by an illness which no drug can cure. A competent terminal patient must have the option of assisted suicide because it is in the best interest of that person.
Medical technology has failed to save a loved-one. But, successful or not, medicine has a high price attached to it. A competent dying person has some knowledge of this, and with every day that he or she is kept alive, the hospital costs skyrocket.
Human life is expensive, and in the hospital there are only a few affluent terminal patients who can afford to prolong what life is left in them. As for the not-so-affluent patients, the cost of their lives is left to their families. Of course, most families do not consider the cost while the terminally ill loved-one is still alive.
When that loved-one passes away, however, the family has to struggle with a huge hospital bill and are often subject to financial ruin.
Most terminal patients want their death to be a peaceful one and with as much consolation as possible. To leave the family in financial ruin is by no means a form of consolation.
Those terminally ill patients who have accepted their imminent death cannot prevent their families from plunging into financial debt because they do not have the option of halting the medical bills from piling up. Finally, many terminal patients want the right to assisted suicide because it is a means to endure their end without the unnecessary suffering and cost.
Most, also, believe that the right to assisted suicide is an inherent right which does not have to be given to the individual.
It is a liberty which cannot be denied because those who are dying might want to use this liberty as a way to pursue their happiness. Terminally ill patients should be allowed to die with dignity.
Choosing the right to assisted suicide would be a final exercise of autonomy for the dying. They will not be seen as people who are waiting to die but as human beings making one final active choice in their lives.
On the other side of the issue, however, people who are against assisted suicide do not believe that the terminally ill have the right to end their suffering.Latest breaking news, including politics, crime and celebrity.
Find stories, updates and expert opinion. However, physician-assisted suicide should be legalized because it offers terminally ill people an opportunity for a peaceful death and recognized the inadequacy of .
Euthanasia in Australia - Although euthanasia is a complex and controversial subject, under certain conditions people should have the right to decide to end their own lives. Should Assisted Suicide Be Legal essay writing service, custom Should Assisted Suicide Be Legal papers, term papers, free Should Assisted Suicide Be Legal .
Assisted Suicide Should Not Be Legal Essay - Assisted Suicide has been a controversial issue for some time now. It is also confused with the term euthanasia; however the two do not mean the same thing.
The Situation in the Netherlands In the Netherlands, the practice of euthanasia and assisted suicide was legalized by legislative decree in November